Search for: "Spring v County of Monroe" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
On this episode, plaintiffs from the landmark case of Monroe v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Wenninger’s article The VW Diesel Emissions Scandal and the Spanish Class Action is cited in the following article: Richard Marcus, Revolution v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
E-mail correspondence between Spring and the "in-house" counsel for the County found in the confidential record at certain pages were exempt from FOIL disclosure as "counsel for the County represented Spring only in Spring's capacity as a County employee. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The court’s decision by Monroe County Commercial Division Justice Matthew A. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:12 am
On March 10, 2016, Leesfield Scolaro co-sponsored the Monroe County Bar Association luncheon honoring Appellate Judge Ed Scales. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:12 am by Leesfield Scolaro
On March 10, 2016, Leesfield Scolaro co-sponsored the Monroe County Bar Association luncheon honoring Appellate Judge Ed Scales. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:12 am by Leesfield Scolaro
On March 10, 2016, Leesfield Scolaro co-sponsored the Monroe County Bar Association luncheon honoring Appellate Judge Ed Scales. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:12 am by Leesfield Scolaro
On March 10, 2016, Leesfield Scolaro co-sponsored the Monroe County Bar Association luncheon honoring Appellate Judge Ed Scales. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:12 am by Leesfield Scolaro
On March 10, 2016, Leesfield Scolaro co-sponsored the Monroe County Bar Association luncheon honoring Appellate Judge Ed Scales. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 6:19 am by Jon Gelman
The Third District Court by contrast includes only two Circuits, essentially Dade and Monroe Counties, that is Miami and the Florida Keys. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
Judge Miller, the trial court Judge in Monroe County, relying on the decision in LAP v State, 62 So.3d 683 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2011), dismissed the charges in Debaun because the sexual activity was between two men and LAP defined sexual intercourse as sexual contact between male and female genitalia. [read post]