Search for: "State v. Block"
Results 1 - 20
of 10,652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:29 pm
Harper, and the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:27 am
" The Supreme Court reaffirmed this in Regan v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Juliana v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
State and Local Preemption. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm
Related Cases: Google v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The Act requires the President to identify and submit a report on any foreign persons that are targeted under EU and UK Russia-related sanctions and eligible for designation for United States blocking sanctions under specified Russia-related executive orders or the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, but that are not in fact designated. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:52 pm
” UC President Michael V. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 22, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated administrative and federal district court proceedings to block Tapestry, Inc. [read post]
