Search for: "State v. Kerns" Results 1 - 20 of 306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
On these facts the cross-reference to Kern was too general, and the anticipation attack failed (neither document alone contained a clear and unambiguous disclosure). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:20 am by Ellena Erskine
NetChoice, LLC and NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code § 5412, was not presented at trial can be found in the Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Raymond Craig Penrose v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 7:54 am by Andria So
Kern is the county with the highest rate of oil and gas activity in the state—producing more than three-fourths of all onshore oil in California. [read post]
Kern County Bd. of Supervisors (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 708 at page 752, blogged on here.) [read post]