Search for: "State v. Stauffer"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
Sometimes interim injunctions are granted in order to prevent the defendant building a bridgehead (see Monsanto v Stauffer [1984] FSR 574). [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 3:57 am
United Kingdom (C-246/89), Centro di Musicologia Walter Stauffer (C-386/04) and Schmelz (C-97/09). [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
The Last Throes of the British Pro-Nazi Right, 1940-45), Bill V. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 270–71 (1994) (collecting cases); see also United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:05 am
Super. 1993) (the statute begins to run when the injured party possesses sufficient critical facts to put him on notice that a wrong has been committed and that he need investigate to determine whether he is entitled to redress); Stauffer v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:51 am
Simonian v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
And, in Stauffer v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:51 am
Rogers v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:35 am
The Federal Circuit specifically declined to address this question last year in Stauffer v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
See Stauffer v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:41 am
Agency of Natural Res. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
Bon Tool, at the end of last year.Earlier this year the United States supported Stauffer, the false marking relator that convinced the Federal Circuit to reverse the dismissal of his suit against Brooks Brothers on the question of standing based the allegations of harm. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm
Indeed, qui tam relators likely took heart from the Federal Circuit’s August 2010 decision in Stauffer v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
(Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Breaking news: Lara Jade Coton awarded $130,000 in damages (Plagiarism Today) Ohio record pirating statute pre-empted by Copyright Act: State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:54 pm
Virginia Legal History Linda Greenhouse (Yale Law) presents “Before Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Unfortunately, the CAFC declined to answer that question in Stauffer v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:28 am
Stauffer v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
Stauffer properly pleaded his standing, and it was error for the district court to dismiss his complaint.Reversed (and remanded to address the merits of the case, including Brooks Brothers's motion to dismiss on the grounds that Stauffer didn't properly plead the required intent to deceive).Stauffer v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:55 pm
In a much anticipated decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held in Stauffer v. [read post]
