Search for: "State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Williams"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
This was the point of Justice Thomas’ very first question to Jason Murray, and it was a recurring theme throughout the argument. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Thomas any better? [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
See also Taranov ex rel. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,[3] languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Arneson, 766 F.3d 774 (8th Cir. 2014); State ex rel. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
Over a century ago, in Ohio ex rel. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
”Article II and the offhand meaning given to it in Blacker made a return appearance in the second—and dispositive—Supreme Court go-around (Bush II) in the Florida matter, in the concurring opinion for Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Thomas C. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Roberts Court Slowly Inters Justice Kennedy's Ephemeral "Jurisprudence of Doubt"
30 Jun 2020, 4:01 pm
S. 763, 784 (1950); United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,3 languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Cook & Tommy Shaw Found. ex rel. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
The outcome in Trump v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
On February 7, a three-judge panel—Judges William C. [read post]
