Search for: "State Highway Department v. Roberts"
Results 1 - 20
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
When the highway went in, the land was condemned. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
Devillier's ranch as a result of a highway project. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:22 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:16 am
Maine (an earlier state sovereign immunity case) and District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Robert Genis, for appellant. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Robert Genis, for appellant. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
” The Ofcom investigation took into account “new laws in Russia which effectively criminalise any independent journalism that departs from the Russian state’s own news narrative,” which make it “impossible for RT to comply with the due impartiality rules,” the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s divided opinions in June Medical Services v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:21 am
Assuming without deciding that United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
” ― Robert A. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm
Roberts explains that Secretary Duke was "bound by the Attorney General's legal determination" concerning Texas v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Attorney General declined to appeal Wrenn v. [read post]