Search for: "State of Maine v. Strom"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
The case threatens to undermine Caniglia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:00 pm
Strom, the First Circuit Court of Appeals (which includes Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, and Rhode Island) identified a new exception to the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures in the home. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
These companies have been “blacklisted” under Section 1237 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 1999, as amended. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 8:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
The first will, in almost all states (save Maine and Nebraska) award the entirety of the state’s electors to the hegemons’ favorite candidate. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
It also allowed me to introduce some of the main rivals in the story — Fortas, Lyndon Johnson, Strom Thurmond, James Eastland, etc. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 3:04 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 8:00 pm
., a gay-rights advocacy group, won a 4-3 victory in the Wisconsin Supreme Court on June 5 in Storms v. [read post]