Search for: "State of Utah v. Hatch" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court, in one of its most historical decisions, Marbury v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
Stark’s insights were interesting in that his docket in the District of Delaware is flooded with patent and Hatch-Waxman Act litigation. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Senators Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) introduced the Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act of 2018, a bill intended to regulate sports betting. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:01 am by Andrew Hamm
” In their press releases announcing the proposed legislation, Hatch and Cotton mentioned victims in their states whom Sessions also discussed. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm by Mark Walsh
Orrin Hatch, Republican of Utah, who has not signed on to that brief, arrives and takes a seat in the bar section. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:19 pm by Lindsay M. Harris
Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) stated: Like you, I am committed to ensuring that those with legitimate claims of asylum are not returned to persecution, particularly for technical deficiencies. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Christopher Walker
.), joined by Senators Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), introduced the Regulatory Accountability Act of 2017. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
Orrin Hatch’s op-ed on his meeting with Garland before the meeting took place. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Christopher Walker
Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) remarked that “the courts stand as the only truly independent check on out-of-control regulators, but judicial deference to the agencies undercuts the courts’ ability to hold the government accountable to the law. [read post]