Search for: "State v Farris"
Results 1 - 20
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 9:34 am
South Carolina’s 6-week abortion ban has faced several legal challenges since its inception after Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 8:16 am
Additionally, where an accused knows about certain evidence and denies any knowledge, an intent to mislead is established (see: Farris v The Queen, 1965 CanII 201 (ONCA)) Furthermore, as per R v Prashad, 2004 CanLII 34382 (ONCA) the Crown does not need to prove that the accused lied about a matter which is actually fact, only that he gave evidence that he knew to be dishonest with an intent to mislead the court. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:36 am
The opinion is styled, Dustin Farris v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 10:22 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 4:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
See Landrigan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm
Farris argued on behalf of the petitioners in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 6:07 pm
Rick Kittel won in State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:38 am
Tyler V. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
In Ayestas v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:43 am
Apelt v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm
United States. [read post]