Search for: "State v. Akerman" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 8:15 am by Eric Goldman
(MN) Frederick Andrew Braunstein, Akerman LLP (left the case in 2021) Reena Jain, Akerman LLP (left the case in 2021) Ronald J. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Moreover, charities do not have the same resources as the state, so if the state is entitled to use bright line criteria for distribution of benefits, still more will that be true for a charity. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am by Giles Peaker
Following Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd (2015) UKSC 15: The objective – to restart an income stream from the property – was sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm by Scott Bomboy
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A claim for simple negligence is “restricted to those cases where the alleged negligent act is readily determinable by the trier of the facts on common knowledge,” whereas a claim for malpractice is one that typically requires expert testimony or other specialized knowledge (Hale v State of New York, 53 AD2d 1025, 1025 [4th Dept 1976]). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 3:13 pm
  In the case of Re: Akerman, Akerman v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:00 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Qui Tam “The Bayrock Qui Tam Litigation Partnership,” Plaintiff, v. [read post]