Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners" Results 1 - 20 of 926
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2014, 9:00 am by and
By Jay Levine and Darcy Jalandoni This podcast discusses the background and potential legal implications, particularly on state licensing boards, of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the court said that the Medical Board "properly based its conclusion on its examination" of the Applicant and his medical records, which provided some credible evidence to support its findings. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the court said that the Medical Board "properly based its conclusion on its examination" of the Applicant and his medical records, which provided some credible evidence to support its findings. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 1:25 pm by Rhonda Shirreff
  Jurisprudence on independent medical examinations (IME) in the context of the employer’s duty to accommodate is sparse. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:15 am by Eric M. Fraser
Next week, on October 14, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 2:28 pm by Tyler Loga
The post BRB Dismisses DBA Appeals When Ugandan Claimants Refuse to Attend Medical Examinations appeared first on MBLB. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained the evidence submitted at the hearing included the Medical Board's physical examination of Petitioner and its exhaustive review of the conflicting medical evidence from examining physicians, as well as Petitioner's acknowledgment that she could, without assistance, "perform daily life activities such as bathing, dressing, and walking. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained the evidence submitted at the hearing included the Medical Board's physical examination of Petitioner and its exhaustive review of the conflicting medical evidence from examining physicians, as well as Petitioner's acknowledgment that she could, without assistance, "perform daily life activities such as bathing, dressing, and walking. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Board of Educ. of Patchogue-Medford Union Free School Dist., 70 NY2d 57, said that it is well-settled that “teachers in this State are generally required to submit to an examination to determine their physical and mental fitness to perform their duties,” and that teachers “therefore have a diminished expectation of privacy with respect to State inquiries into their physical fitness to perform as teachers. [read post]