Search for: "State v. D.D." Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “To state a claim for accountant malpractice, a complaint must allege that there was a departure from accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of the injury suffered by plaintiff (D.D. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 8:13 am by Eugene Volokh
K.D. v D.D., officially released today by the Appellate Court of Connecticut, in an opinion by Judge Douglas Lavine, joined by Chief Judge William Bright and then-Judge Joan Alexander, involved a restraining order obtained by a divorcing wife against her husband: [The plaintiff wife] testified that on the evening of June 24, 2021, she went to a restaurant with a group of others, including friends of the defendant. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “In order to succeed on a claim for accounting malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate a departure from accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of injury (see KBL, LLP v Community Counseling & Mediation Servs., 123 AD3d 488 [2014]; Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v Arnold, 41 AD3d 788 [2007]; D.D. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 12:51 pm by Unknown
Poarch Band of Creek Indians (Cultural Resources; Sovereign Immunity; NAGPRA) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html In the Matter of D.D. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 6:18 am by mtlawlibrary
State Farm DA 20-0052 2021 MT 67 Civil – Damages Matter of D.D., YINC DA 20-0347 2021 MT 66 Civil – Dependent Neglect State  v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 1:01 pm by mtlawlibrary
Matter of D.D., YINC DA 20-0347 2021 MT 66 3/16/2021 6:00:00 AM State  v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:28 am by Léon Dijkman
In particular, "the seriousness of what is at stake for the applicant will be of relevance for assessing the adequacy and fairness of the procedures" [App No. 13469/06, D.D. v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 2:44 pm by mtlawlibrary
Marriage of Miller and Sliger DA 19-0300 2020 MT 129N Civil – Domestic Relations State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants are not professionals as required for a claim for professional malpractice (see Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group, 96 NY2d 20, 28 [2001]; Starr v Fuoco Group LLP, 137 AD3d 634, 634 [1st Dept 2016]; Leather v United States Trust Co. of N. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Town of Kinderhook v Vona, 136 AD3d 1202, 1204 (3rct Dept. 2016); see D.D. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]