Search for: "State v. Dolce"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Morris v County of Nassau, 158 AD3d at 632, quoting Matter of Dolce v Nassau County Traffic & Parking Violations Agency, 7 NY3d 492, 498). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Morris v County of Nassau, 158 AD3d at 632, quoting Matter of Dolce v Nassau County Traffic & Parking Violations Agency, 7 NY3d 492, 498). [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:59 am
How far does the first sale or "exhaustion" principle extend in the United States? [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:01 pm
Dolce, 383 N.J. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
Italy Dolce and Gabbana has filed a defamation lawsuit against two fashion bloggers who reposted anti-Asian comments attributed to one of the designers. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
Dolce, 383 N.J. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
See Dolce v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:17 am
Ltd v Aiwa Corp. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:41 pm
On this particular tax issue, the recent decision on the “Dolce & Gabbana” case should probably have offered more comfort and perhaps the incentive to face the inquiry and challenge the tax audit in the tax court. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:34 am
Dolce v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 8:46 am
Dolce Vita Sa, Inc., 992 So. 2d 859, 861 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am
” But on a separate issue, he did not state a False Claims Act whistleblower retaliation claim against individual town officials because a 2009 amendment did not expand the FCA to provide individual liability (Howell v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
Div. 2003) (no specific age equates to emancipation of the child); Dolce v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 5:52 am
Dolce Vida Medical Spa (download here). [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:15 am
Dolce v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:04 am
This one succeeded.The case is Lynch v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
That means that §602(a)(1) allows the importation into the United States of a copy of a protected work purchased abroad. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:12 am
This Kat thinks that under US law the response should be pretty straightforward, in the sense of 'No' being likely answer, as any potentially infringing activities might be considered fair use within §107 of the Copyright Act, particularly because of their transformative nature [as recent examples, see Cariou v Prince, here, and Seltzer v Green Day, here]. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:46 pm
Div. 2003) (no specific age equates to emancipation of the child); Dolce v. [read post]
