Search for: "State v. Dove" Results 1 - 20 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Thank you to "an anonymous friend" for bringing this case to my attention.In the context of a restitution motion, in United States of America v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:44 am by Alexis Campbell
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s decision that a state code revision commission cannot claim copyright protection over annotated state code in Georgia et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 11:30 am
  Bong Hits For Jesus” (Morse v. [read post]
31 Dec 2002, 10:00 pm
Dove Healthcare, LLC, which we reported on in our bulletin earlier this year. [read post]
31 Dec 2002, 10:00 pm
Dove Healthcare, LLC, which we reported on in our bulletin earlier this year. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 7:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Dove stated it started back in 2010 with different users and then Sherri Stewart's name with the same messages and pattern as before. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The case was filed by a man who broke his neck and was paralyzed after he dove into a pond at a World War II veterans memorial park that was operated by the state. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html Corey Lee Dove v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  As is well known, First Amendment protection extends to expressive conduct such as flag burning (see, eg, United States v Eichman 496 US 310 (1990)) and to conduct which is grossly offensive – such as demonstrators in Nazi uniforms marching through a Jewish community (Smith v Collin 439 U.S. 916 (1978)). [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
The most recent Maryland Court of Appeals case discussing whether Maritime Law applies can be found in Matthews v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On 4 November, Mr Justice Nicol handed down an anonymised judgment in ERY v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2016] EWHC 2760 (QB)). [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
I'm not making any predictions about what will happen in Columbus, Ohio, on November 18, but here's a prediction I will make: The Michigan Supreme Court will not soon issue a Crawford opinion as absurd as the one issued this week (over a nice dissent) by a 4-3 majority of the Ohio Supreme Court in State v. [read post]