Search for: "State v. Duxbury"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
All courts in the United States are bound by vertical precedent to follow the holdings of decisions by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:31 am
Faced with mixed jurisprudence from other jurisdictions, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal answers this question for that province in Crook v Druxbury, 2020 SKCA 43 (CanLII), rendering a decision that is harmonious with the state of the law in Alberta and British Columbia. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:08 am
Maine Supreme Court - Arbitrator improperly ignored time limits on grievance processingThe Maine Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:46 am
The state high court concluded that G. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:56 am
More recently, an Alberta court in Duxbury v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Additional Resources: EVERYTHING SOCIAL SECURITY: Be prepared when disaster strikes, December 4, 2015, Wicked Local Duxbury, by Kirsten Alberino More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 1:29 am
Duxbury v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm
Duxbury v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:15 pm
Duxbury v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:33 am
Related Posts: Breaking: SJC Rules For Lenders and MERS In Eaton v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:33 am
New Massachusetts Foreclosure Prevention Law Passed Breaking: SJC Rules For Lenders and MERS In Eaton v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:37 am
McB. v L.E. 5 October [2010] ECR I-nyr at paragraph 53 the Third Section of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU) interpreted ed this provision of the Charter as meaning that where Charter rights paralleled ECHR rights the CJEU should follow any clear and constant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:22 am
McB. v L.E. 5 October [2010] ECR I-nyr at paragraph 53 the Third Section of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU) interpreted ed this provision of the Charter as meaning that where Charter rights paralleled ECHR rights the CJEU should follow any clear and constant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 12:47 pm
Mark Eugene Duxbury v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
Astrue v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:23 am
Duxbury v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm
Duxbury, Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am
(Duxbury, MA) Bluegreen Management, Inc. [read post]
