Search for: "State v. Eagle Star"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
Atari Interactive v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:28 am
In Kenya, the High Court dismissed an application for injunction in Netresource Limited v Ministry of Education & 3 others stating that no prima facie case was established. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
Stated alternatively, “Why do we infer ownership from possession? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am
We’ve blogged about state laws directed at ownership of (and privacy regarding) employee social media [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The drinks are on Eagle Rare as the Court of Appeal grounds American EagleLiverpool Gin Distillery Ltd v Sazerac Brands [2021] EWCA Civ 1207 (August 2021) In Volume 8 I described how the High Court, in the form of Mr Justice Fancourt, decided that an AMERICAN EAGLE bourbon whiskey infringed Sazerac’s rights in EAGLE RARE for whiskey as it would indirectly confuse consumers into believing the two brands were connected. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
And in the article, he states that the aggregate impact of marginal gains can be significant when they are compounded. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:05 am
Gutman also granted Plaintiff “the exclusive world-wide right and license to use her name ‘Hayley’, ‘Paige’, ‘Hayley Paige Gutman’, ‘Hayley Gutman’, ‘Hayley Paige’ or any derivative thereof ([defined] collectively [as] the ‘Designer’s Name’)” for certain purposes during the stated term of the Contract and for two years thereafter. . . . [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:30 am
Some have discounted the anti-Semitic remarks of Nick Cannon and, shortly before that, from Philadelphia Eagles wide receiver DeSean Jackson as taking attention away from Black Lives Matter and efforts to address racial injustice in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
The Court of Appeal began with the ‘reasonable recipient’ test in Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Assurance Co Ltd (1997) AC 747 which concerned notices under break clauses in commercial leases. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
The Court of Appeal began with the ‘reasonable recipient’ test in Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Assurance Co Ltd (1997) AC 747 which concerned notices under break clauses in commercial leases. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
K Street’s Newest Star Built Business on Dubious Claims of Trump Ties Laredo Morning Times – Beth Reinhard and Jonathan O’Connell (Washington Post) | Published: 11/1/2019 Since President Trump took office, the lobbyist Michael Esposito has been wildly successful, turning a family business that once focused on municipal transportation issues into one of the fastest-growing lobbying firms in Washington, D.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 3:30 pm
The volume’s editors (Arizona State University’s David H. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 1:01 am
The Eagle has landed. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:03 am
The Judge referred to the legal test set out in the case of Mannai Investment v Eagle Star which decided that even if a notice contained some errors, if it was clear and unambiguous so that the receiver was left in no reasonable doubt what was being asked (demanded), then it was effective. [read post]
