Search for: "State v. Gotshall"
Results 1 - 20
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:46 pm
by Dennis Crouch Pacific BioSciences v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:34 am
Assoc., Ltd., 266 AD2d 125, 125 [1st Dept 1999]; see also Schauer v Joyce, 54 NY2d 1, 6 [1981] [holding that allegation that another attorney “contributed to or aggravated [plaintiffs] injuries” sufficiently stated contribution claim]. [read post]
Former North Dakota women’s health clinic files amended complaint challenging statewide abortion ban
13 Jun 2023, 11:02 am
The Supreme Court overturned Roe with Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
To satisfy the pleading requirement for causation, a plaintiff must allege that “‘but for’ the attorney’s conduct [or nonfeasance], the client would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” ( Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; Cosmetics Plus Group, Ltd. v Traub, 105 AD3d 134, 140-141 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 11:01 pm
Its in-house adjudicative proceedings are somewhat controversial, and the Supreme Court is now working on its Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
Due to the unforeseen unavailability of a panel member, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had to postpone the Epic Games v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:52 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am
Back then he was with Gibson Dunn; he has recently joined Weil, Gotshal & Manges. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:37 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 1:48 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s new eligibility decision in CareDx, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:08 am
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 9 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 3:33 am
Regarding damages, “to survive a … pre-answer dismissal motion, a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct [or nonfeasance] may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:33 am
Thus, plaintiff failed to show, as required to state a cause of action for legal malpractice, that but for defendants’ conduct he would have prevailed in the underlying action (see Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
Halper, Ellen V. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 7:44 am
‘I don’t love what Weil did here and I think it could have been handled other ways, but I am not sure whether it rises to the level of a new trial.'” “Waivable Conflict Not Validly Waived, Leads To Remand for New Trial” — “In United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
Plaintiff failed to return to Manhattan by the stated deadline under the settlement. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Thus, a plaintiff must meet the “case within a case” requirement to avoid dismissal (see Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Himelfarb, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Sunday, January 27, 2019 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Audit committee, Audits, Brexit, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Cybersecurity, Disclosure, FASB, Financial reporting, GAAP, International governance, LIBOR, PCAOB, SEC Finalized ISS FAQ Updates on Compensation Policies and Equity Compensation Plans Posted by Michael Albano, Julia M. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Wade, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Wednesday, October 17, 2018 Tags: Broker-dealers, DTC, Ownership, Public firms, Securities litigation, Shareholder meetings, Shareholder voting Mandated Gender Diversity for California Boards Posted by Howard Dicker, Lyuba Goltser and Erika Kaneko, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Thursday, October 18, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Boards of… [read post]
