Search for: "State v. Harding" Results 1 - 20 of 17,990
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm by Josh Blackman
Tseytlin had a hard time believing that Chief Justice John G. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
     I believe that the Supreme Court will decide Smith v. [read post]
Senate Bill 276 passed the Louisiana legislature on Thursday, two years after the US Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”It is hard to counter that view when Justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito flaunt their political sympathies or when the Court trashed its own precedents on the way to overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
Adding to these challenges is the adoption by the Supreme Court of the “Major Questions Doctrine” in the 2022 case West Virginia v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:22 pm by Howard Bashman
” And Adam Gopnik has a Critic at Large essay titled “Why Liberals Struggle to Defend Liberalism: We may be months away from the greatest crisis the liberal state has known since the Civil War; How come it’s so hard to say what we’re defending? [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm by David Pozen
Schedule I of the CSA imposes a complete criminal ban; schedules II through V allow drugs to be prescribed under certain conditions. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]