Search for: "State v. Jews" Results 1 - 20 of 937
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 3:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Almost immediately after doing so, the Defendant said "Free Palestine" and stated that "the Jews have to die. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
United States and Free Exercise after Fulton, 75 Ala. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:49 pm
The authors compare the court’s approach with that of courts in Spain, Switzerland, and the United States. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:12 pm
In addition, from the religious point of view, it is likely that Israel will continue to view the criticism as just another episode in millennia old patterns of dealing with a substantially despised (and sometimes feared) population  Whatever the realities, that produces a singularly low level of trust in whatever assurances or performances of (especially critical) States with long histories of unfortunate relations with "their" Jews. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Jews must not be ordered to obey Christian theology. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From Friday's decision by Judge Denise Cote (S.D.N.Y.) in Farrakhan v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:22 am by Frank Cranmer
The impugned decrees stated that, where animals were slaughtered in accordance with special methods required for religious rites, the stunning method applied would be reversible and non-lethal. [read post]