Search for: "State v. K. B. G."
Results 1 - 20
of 743
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm
HUS is a frightening complication that even in the best American centers has a notable mortality rate.[56] Among survivors, at least 5 percent will suffer end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the resultant need for dialysis or transplantation.[57] But, “[b]ecause renal failure can progress slowly over decades, the eventual incidence of ESRD cannot yet be determined. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Coyle, Arthur Eisenberg, Rae Shih, Molly K. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Coyle, Arthur Eisenberg, Rae Shih, Molly K. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
HUS is a frightening complication that even in the best American centers has a notable mortality rate.[56] Among survivors, at least 5 percent will suffer end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the resultant need for dialysis or transplantation.[57] But, “[b]ecause renal failure can progress slowly over decades, the eventual incidence of ESRD cannot yet be determined. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
This differential concept was first popularized by the Judge Learned Hand decision in Metallizing Eng’g Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
New Subpart 1600 of Regulation S-K New Subpart 1600 to Regulation S-K sets forth specialized disclosure requirements applicable to SPACs regarding the sponsor, potential conflicts of interest and dilution, among other things. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Dustin B. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Securities and Exchange Regulation S-K[2] can support a securities fraud claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, even absent an otherwise misleading statement.[3] The plaintiffs alleged that Macquarie had issued material misstatements and omissions concerning the potential impact of new international fuel regulations on the company’s fuel storage business, in violation of both the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
Examples of fringe costs include costs incurred for vacations, sick leave, holidays, military leave, employer pension and 401(k) contributions, payroll and unemployment taxes, insurance, and other employee benefits. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
But this self-serving relationship between activist short-sellers and entrepreneurial plaintiff officers of the court is conflict-ridden and hinders the fact finder’s impartiality when a short report forms the basis for lead plaintiffs’ alleged violations of the federal securities laws under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:09 pm
All of the above g. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
Olówa Aiyere, Agiri Ilé-Ilógbón; Olúwa mi; amoimotán, A kò mo O tàn kose, A ba mo tàn kose, A bà mo tán ìbà se ke. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
Muris, Deborah Platt Majoras, William Kovacic, Jon Leibowitz, Edith Ramirez, Maureen K. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Supreme Court observed that the Automatic Orders are codified within DRL § 236(B)(2)(b). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
