Search for: "State v. Lenz"
Results 1 - 20
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:27 am
Lenz v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm
Lenz, Principal Medical Device Regulation Expert & Steven J. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:22 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
Lenz, Principal Medical Device Regulation Expert —It takes a significant amount of time, cost, and effort to prepare a premarket notification 510(k) submission. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:46 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 10:36 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
The Lenz case got a lot of press, but it ended with a confidential settlement. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:28 pm
Lenz v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
So held the Appellate Division, First Department, in its August 19, 2021 decision in Tiozzo v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 3:34 am
Assaf, 136 AD3d 1131, 1135 [3d Dep’t 2016]; Sutch v Sutch-Lenz, 129 AD3d 1141, 1144 [2015]; Town ofN. [read post]
