Search for: "State v. Li"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
That difference lies in the different definitions of “crime against humanity,” “extermination,” and “genocide. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:52 am
Section 127.304(i) explicitly states “the decision of the [SBA’s Director for Government Contracting] to decline certification is the final agency decision. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:03 pm
Authors: Liz Hastilow, Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Steven Li, Liam Mackay and Mia Blundell. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
In 2019, he told Paris Match magazine that Charlotte Lewis had lied about being sexually assaulted by him four decades ago. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:16 pm
Carlisle v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am
In In Re Jackson, Judge Leval applied this approach to a right of publicity claim, but it is applicable to any state law cause of action, and in X v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:17 pm
The burden of proof lies with the defendant. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:58 pm
Gibbs & Ana Loloei & Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —FDA has long touted the use of real-world evidence (RWE). [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
Ernst & Ernst v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
The third focuses cognitive control of target populations of competitor or target states (and other collectives) connected to "cold war. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
