Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 10:48 am
Particularly of note was the 2024 Veirein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:21 am
She said The digitisation of the processes will follow as soon as possible for the existing contracts, provided that the Lord Chancellor’s court assessment suggests that the system can cope. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Lord, Williston on Contracts § 56:92 [4th ed, May 2023 update]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Lord, Williston on Contracts § 56:92 [4th ed, May 2023 update]). [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:21 am
To further justify deference, the court cited A v Secretary of State for the Home Department, also known as the Belmarsh 9 case, in which the English House of Lords held that deference would be given to the executive’s decision on the assessment of public emergency and the counter-measure devised after the 9/11 terrorist attack in the US. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Martin Kratz, R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
The DPDI Bill is currently being debated in the House of Lords. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
However, Lord Justice Arnold dismissed this stating that while people and documents may no longer be available, the fact that Lidl were still relying on privilege between their trade mark attorneys to not disclose certain information suggested that documentation may still be available. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:33 am
There have been quite a few “Halliburton” appeals in the last couple of decades and at least one example in the House of Lords/Supreme Court (Conor v Angiotech [2008]). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Lord Justice Arnold gave observations on the EBA’s decision in G2/21. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am
You can read the Lord Chancellor’s speech here. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
