Search for: "State v. Lucente"
Results 1 - 20
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2005, 12:49 am
See also,MP3: Crater v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:06 am
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court denied Microsoft Corporation’s petition for writ of certiorari in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:22 pm
Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 4:25 am
See, e.g., Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 1:13 am
Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:49 am
The district court held that the plaintiff's expert's testimony ran afoul of the Federal Circuit's decision in Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:58 pm
The appeal in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:53 pm
Clair's motion, Nokia, relying on Lucent Techcs. v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 4:46 am
Nokia and Lucent Tech. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:08 am
In [Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:58 pm
Alcatel Lucent and Sunoco v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 11:52 am
Inc v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 12:32 pm
Inc v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:56 am
Chart 9a suggests that the overall success rate for patentees is only 33%, with only two judicial districts [ED TX and MD FL) giving patentee success rates above 50%.Chart 3 gives a "top 10" in damage awards, with number 2 being the 2007 Lucent v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:23 am
The court stated that "[u]nder the patent laws, certain broad categories of subject matter are eligible for patent protection," and cited the language from Section 101 (" Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter, or a new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title") and the United States Supreme Court's decision in Bilski… [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:38 am
In Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
In the case of Braintree v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:45 am
PrecisionFlow Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Nevada v. [read post]