Search for: "State v. Lucente"
Results 1 - 20
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
Taken on its face, the statement seems overbroad and potentially problematic for the reason set forth by another Federal Circuit panel in Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:58 pm
Huawei, Alcatel-Lucent, Nokia, and Samsung Fee Order Traxcell v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm
”[8] This text states that a corporation’s cooperation with the government’s investigation is a mitigating factor by which a corporation can gain credit. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:02 am
In Lucent v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Alcatel-Lucent, 441 F.Supp.3d 68 (E.D. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 12:15 pm
Cir. 2018) (some alterations in original) (quoting Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Alcatel-Lucent, No. 18-2119 (E.D. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:41 pm
Microsoft intervened and ultimately resolved the issue.Finally, Ericsson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:30 am
Lucent Tech., Inc., 442 F.3d 727, 732 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing Executone Info. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
Lucente, 472 N.E.2d 791, 794 (Ill. 1984) (“Where a written agreement is clear and explicit, a court must enforce the agreement as written. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 9:19 am
” Lucent Techs., 580 F.3d at 1334. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:07 pm
Meanwhie, other Qualcomm v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Lucent Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Lucent Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:58 pm
Alcatel Lucent and Sunoco v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:38 pm
Nokia has made no allusion that it believes its shares are undervalued, stating that the repurchases are only part of its ongoing capital structure optimisation program, which it has invested a total of €7 billion in since October 2015, mainly for de-leveraging purposes as a consequence of the Alcatel-Lucent acquisition.While it is fair to assume Nokia did not believe its shares were undervalued at the time, the evidence tends to suggest otherwise. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm
Lucente v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:12 am
”(emphases added)); Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:58 am
And Lucent v. [read post]
