Search for: "State v. Mazzone" Results 1 - 20 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Can a Public High School Punish a Student for Asking a Question that Refers to “Illegal Aliens”? Part Two in a Two-Part Series
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Can a Public High School Punish a Student for Asking a Question that Refers to “Illegal Aliens”? Part One in a Two-Part Series
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In 1969, in Tinker v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Recent Headlines Confirm the Inadequacy of the Supreme Court’s Reasoning in Trump v. Anderson
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In two of my last three Verdict columns (this one and then this one co-authored with Jason Mazzone), I have discussed—in connection with the Supreme Court’s consideration in Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The Supreme Court’s Misplaced Emphasis on Uniformity in Trump v. Anderson (and Bush v. Gore)
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Was the Federal District Court Correct in Dismissing Disney’s Speech-Retaliation Case Against Florida Officials?
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar, Jason Mazzone and Lena Shapiro
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Josh Blackman] Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Professor Jason Mazzone describes the brief as "eye-popping and game-changing. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Does Diversity Have a Future?
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The Not-so-Subtle Vices of a None-too-Passive Supreme Court
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Griswold v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
More Developments in Moore (v. Harper), and the Central Role Justice Anthony Kennedy Has Played in Addressing the “Independent State Legislature” Theory (ISL) that Moore Raises
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
G expressed disagreement with the core of ISL—that elected state legislatures were freed of the state constitutions that created those very legislatures by virtue of something in the federal Constitution. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
“Independent State Legislature” Theory, North Carolina, and Ohio
1 May 2023, 7:43 pm by Justin Levitt
Vik Amar and Jason Mazzone suggest that the Court grant cert. pronto in Huffman v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
The Court Should Maintain Optionality in Resolving the So-Called “Independent State Legislature” (ISL) Theory by Granting Cert. in Huffman v. Neiman Right Away as the Justices Chew on Whether Moore v. Harper is Moot
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That mattered for the 2010 congressional-election cycle.An even more dramatic example is United States v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  In my columns, I cited with approval a two-part Verdict series by Illinois Law's Dean Vikram Amar and his colleague Professor Jason Mazzone. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
What Law Students Should Take Away from the Stanford Law School Controversy Involving Disruption of a Federal Judge’s Speech: Part One in a Series
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases such as Ward v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
CFP: Constitutional History: Comparative Perspectives
13 Feb 2023, 5:50 pm by mes286
Examples include Marbury v. [read post]
Legal Scholarship Blog - http://legalscholarshipblog.com
CFP: Constitutional History: Comparative Perspectives
12 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Examples include Marbury v. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
Call for Papers--Conference on Constitutional History: Comparative Perspectives--Bologna, September 14-15, 2023
12 Feb 2023, 6:05 am by Jason Mazzone
Examples include Marbury v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[David Kopel] The legal history of bans on firearms and Bowie knives before 1900
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Cockrum v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Is Justice Kagan Right that Areas of Constitutional Law Should Not Change Quickly on Account of New Membership on the Court?
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
If Originalism Is Going to Be Displaced, Critics Must Do Better than Dean Chemerinsky Seems to Be Doing
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
What Does it Mean for Other Institutions to “Defy” or “Check” the Supreme Court? Not Quite What the Court Invites Those Institutions to Do
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/