Search for: "State v. Nell"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 3:47 pm
” See Nell Gluckman and Katherine Mangan, “The Hardest Judgment: When suicide is the risk, campuses struggle with doing too little or too much. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 8:05 am
The historians' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
The plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:06 am
Daphne Keller explained how the Adalah v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:51 am
Leavitt, the first ISDEAA contract support costs case, and United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 6:05 am
From Nelle v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am
R. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:16 pm
& Loan Assoc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 6:27 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, May 29, 2021 Tags: Capital markets, Cryptocurrency, Financial technology, Investor protection, IPOs, Mergers & acquisitions, Private funds, SEC, Securities regulation, SPACs Memo to Corporate Directors: Three Lessons from the Exxon-Mobil Activist Victory Posted by Nell Minow, ValueEdge Advisors, on Sunday, May 30, 2021 Tags: Boards of Directors, Climate… [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
Mirvis, William Savitt, and Sabastian V. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 9:17 am
Facts: This case (Dysart v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
Steven Kaplan & ValueEdge Advisors’ Nell Minow. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, September 3, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:12 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Executive Compensation, Long-Term value, Repurchases, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder value, Taxation Marking to Market Versus Taking to Market Posted by Guillaume Plantin (Sciences Po) and Jean Tirole (University of Toulouse & IAST) , on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Accounting, Agency costs, Contracts, Fair values, Information… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 2:16 pm
Prime riflessioni) Carlos Manuel Díez Soto, Algunas cuestiones a propósito del derecho de participación del autor de una obra de arte original sobre el precio de reventa (droit de suite) (Some questions concerning the artist’s resale right (droit de suite) Dorothy Estrada Tanck, Protección de las personas migrantes indocumentadas en España con arreglo al Derecho Internacional y Europeo de los derechos humanos (Protection of undocumented migrant persons in… [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 5:33 pm
For example, Harding observes critically a tradition where important concepts in science, such as objectivity v. subjectivity, reason v. emotion, and mind v. body, were considered to have a gendered quality; with the former being masculine and the latter being feminine.[10] Similarly, I ask critically here if the distinction I’ve drawn between “tools” and “cyberspace” is susceptible to the same assumptions. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:20 pm
Opinion here: Gila River Indian Community v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Justice Sotomayor’s opinion in Kokesh v. [read post]
