Search for: "State v. Pies"
Results 1 - 20
of 480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
More information on the PI website. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm
28; R. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 8:44 am
Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:36 pm
ChileSáez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm
Carballo Piñeiro observes that access to justice remains restricted in most jurisdictions, and that a common EU approach remains lacking. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am
But Urban Outfitters v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Protests grew outside TVP’s offices after state media executives were dismissed and the former ruling party, PiS condemned their removal. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Judge Kent Jordan (D.Del) denied the PI motion. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
Przybyszewska and Others v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 12:09 pm
(PI. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 3:38 am
One of those was the 10X Genomics v Nanostring case. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
Earlier, an ex parte PI order was granted by the UPC Local Division Dusseldorf in June 2023 (ORD_ 541204/2023, in the case of myStromer AG v Revolt Zycling AG), The order in the 10x Genomics case was issued yesterday by Presiding Judge Matthias Zigann at the Munich local division of the UPC. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
Earlier, an ex parte PI order was granted by the UPC Local Division Dusseldorf in June 2023 (ORD_ 541204/2023, in the case of myStromer AG v Revolt Zycling AG), The order in the 10x Genomics case was issued yesterday by Presiding Judge Matthias Zigann at the Munich local division of the UPC. [read post]
