Search for: "State v. Rings"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2011, 5:29 pm
ABSTRACT: When it was decided in 2002, Ring v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:21 am
In the courts of talking to the reporter, I learned that there have been a couple more state supreme court cases since I last looked, including one, Cummins v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 11:43 am
The court in Gill v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 6:49 am
Vigil v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Lyle v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 9:08 pm
The best way to ensure that the giver can get an heirloom engagement ring returned to them after divorce is to sign a prenuptial agreement stating that the ring will be returned if the marriage ends. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 5:28 pm
Bilbo states, [The Ring] is mine isn't it? [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:25 pm
See Albinger v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:09 pm
According to an amicus brief filed by the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild in Castro v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 1:23 pm
This was solidified by the court ruling in Crippen v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:22 pm
NOT CHARGED – Solicitation of Prostitution- State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 5:12 am
Guest Blogger - Stephanie Martz, Senior Director, White Collar Crime Policy, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers - Here's an evergreen issue that was just brought to my attention - United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
It would try and block its use at the state and local police levels by tying the ability to get federal monies in grant funding to the state agreement to ban use of biometric technology in its jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 11:31 am
Supreme Court actually is about to decide a case (Elonis v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:28 am
The court in Aronow did, however, consider the issue of fault, stating: The majority rule in this country concerning the disposition of engagement rings is a fault rule: the party who unjustifiably breaks the engagement loses the ring. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:17 pm
V § 9 states that ‘[t]he decisions of the Supreme Court shall bind the Court of Appeals as precedents. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:21 am
Some states consider an engagement ring to be a conditional gift. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:09 pm
Ring Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:57 am
A map of Ring-police partnerships in the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:33 pm
Simply stated: ring giver beware. [read post]