Search for: "State v. Stallman" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Taylor v City of New York 2016 NY Slip Op 03454 Decided on May 3, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Security research continued, opponents Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan Smith Cy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Opponents:Christian Troncoso, BSA | The Software Alliance: we support good faith security testing. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 11:50 am by Katitza Rodriguez
” Katitza Rodriguez, International Rights Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation, United States: "La vigilancia puede y amenaza los derechos humanos. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:20 am by Florian Mueller
For one example, let me refer you to Philip Elmer-Dewitt's article on how I was right and mainstream media were wrong on the March 1, 2013 Apple v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:43 pm by Edward J. Naughton
If you’ve seen the apocalyptic articles on the tech news sites following the jury’s verdict on the copyright claim in Oracle v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:49 pm by William Carleton
However, '[e]ven protected speech is not equally permissible in all places and at all times.' (Snyder v Phelps, 131 S Ct 1207, 1218 [2011], quoting Cornelius v NAACP Legal Defense & Ed. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:11 am by Marie Louise
(ArsTechnica)   Global – Patents With $4.5 billion bid, group led by Apple and Microsoft claims Nortel patents (Prior Art) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Tangible IP) (Tangible IP) (Tangible IP) (PatLit) (IPOsgoode) Canadian Industry Minister asks whether the Investment Canada Act could apply to Nortel sale (Tangible IP) Ontario Superior Court rules on ways to recover domain names: South Simcoe Railway Heritage Corporation v Wakeford (JIPLP)   Canada CRIA targets fair dealing: Tells… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm by WIMS
AFBF President Bob Stallman said, "For the second time, a U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:03 am
Stated another way: was the administrative determination arbitrary or capricious? [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:55 am
The allegedly defamatory remarks are “quintessential expressions of opinion,” which are fully protected by the state and federal constitutions.Justice Stallman said that all of the statements concerning Brackman’s abilities and his performance on the project use loose, figurative language, and none of the statements are objectively capable of being characterized as true or false.Citing Williams v Varig Brazilian Airlines, 169 AD2d 434, the court said that… [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Crowley, public affairs director for the State Liquor Authority who cited [§128 of] the ABC Law as prohibiting such employments. [read post]