Search for: "State v. Tell" Results 1 - 20 of 20,607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am by Ronald Mann
ShareJustice Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion for a unanimous court Thursday in Cantero v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:57 am by Lasnetski Gihon Law
   The name “Miranda” came from the landmark United States Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:38 am by David Oxenford
  (Note that there have been statements from some Supreme Court justices that suggest that this standard that arose in a case, NY Times v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am by Yousuf Syed Khan
On May 20, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) filed applications for arrest warrants in the Situation in the State of Palestine. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
The state court in that case explained that in 1970, in Williams v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Heller and [New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.] [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
(see Murray v Express [2009] Ch 481, para 36) The only considerations which tell against such an expectation is the fact that the children are arriving publicly, at a border, to seek refuge. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
To take an example that echoes his recent attack on Judge Merchan, in 2019 he said that a group of four minority congresswomen should “go back” to the countries they came from rather than “loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States” how to run the government.Here again, Trump is playing to a receptive audience.In recent years Congress has passed many fewer laws than it did decades ago. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
” Although the presumption “tells a court not to assume a districting plan is flawed or to limit the State’s opportunities to defend it,” and “reminds a court that it is a serious matter to find a State in breach of the Constitution,” there is nothing in the Supreme Court’s decisions holding that “a trial court must resolve every plausibly disputed factual issue for the State. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
American courts are traditionally hesitant to tell individuals what must be done with their property. [read post]