Search for: "State v. Weisberg" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An accountant’s engagement letter governs the parameters of their retention (Italia Imports v Weisberg & Lesk, 220 AD2d 226, 226-227 [1st Dept 1995]). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
But, at least for now, she was also a last: the last Justice to have held elective public office (as a state senator, and first female majority leader of a state senate). [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Richard Weisberg, who has a distinctive take on The Merchant of Venice, was part of a group that put together its own version of the courtroom scene from that play. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 12:13 pm
"  True that, I guess.)The Court of Appeal not only affirms, but also drops a footnote:  "We assume the trial court and attorney Weisberg have already reported the judicially imposed sanctions to the State Bar of California. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows:  (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred  eighty-four  thousand  dollars  of  the  payor's  annual  income; provided, however, beginning March  first,  two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes  in  the  consumer … [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, which became known as “the Case of the Frozen Trucker. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Sharon Driscoll discusses the decision with law professor Robert Weisberg. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Juvan Bonni
Freistein: The PTAB Is Not an Article III Court, Part 2: Aqua Products v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
McCarthy Weisberg Cummings, P.C.: The lone Harrisburg entry on this list, I met Larry Weisberg on the opposite side of the “v” in a discrimination case in the Middle District of Pennsylvania involving allegations of a “noose” and other particularly awful discrimination. [read post]