Search for: "State v. Z. A. B." Results 1 - 20 of 418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 From SSRN:Caitlin Millat, Race, Religion, and the Antiparallel, (American Journal of Law and Equality, Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 4776907 (2024).Danny Li, The Comstock Act's Equal Protection Problem, (April 26, 2024).Lawrence B. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Klara Nedrelow
The Factfinding Mission was an exhaustive two-year investigation where “more than 1,000 victims and witnesses were interviewed, and a vast amount of documents, photographs and videos were analy[z]ed. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
That resolution sounds sensible and orderly (and could follow logic suggested in this article by Kyle Langvardt and Alan Z. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by Jason Miller
Weekly Supp. 565b (Nassau Circuit Ct. 2020) Defense Attorney: Susan Z. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It also changed the name of Zen Palate Union Square LLC to Platinum Z, Inc. d/b/a Zen Palate, but the caption was never actually amended, as the stipulation was not “so-ordered,” and the judgment was not actually vacated. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
       (b)  Promoting responsible innovation, competition, and collaboration will allow the United States to lead in AI and unlock the technology’s potential to solve some of society’s most difficult challenges. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
 Cuba represents a most interesting variant of Marxist-Leninist state organization. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
This argument has never been tested by the UK or EU courts, instead only arising when there is an underlying disability that prevents carrying a pregnancy (Murphy v Slough Borough Council [2005] ICR 721; Case C-167/12 CD v ST [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:169; Case C-363/12 Z v A (Re Equal Treatment) ECLI:EU:C:2014:159). [read post]