Search for: "Steven Corn v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 10:40 am
Weekly D1495, 2023 WL 4919540, at *2 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 2, 2023), quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Corning quite rightly called much of the reasoning of the opinion “nonsense. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Sherwin, Wallace Stevens Professor of Law, Director of the Visual Persuasion Project, New York Law School -- Law in the Shadow of Violence: The Riddle and the Paradox of Sovereignty W. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am
Corn and Rachel E. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:58 am
Choice between federal and state courts implicates fundamental questions of fairness [Eric Alexander, Drug and Device Law on Supreme Court certiorari petition in Pfizer v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:20 am
” The much-quoted line comes from West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:37 pm
As you are aware, the TDP states that –Claims involving Disease Levels I–V, VII and VIII that do not meet the presumptiveMedical/Exposure Criteria for the relevant Disease Level may undergo the Asbestos Trust’s Individual Review Process described in Section 5.3(b). [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Stevens, 781 S.W.2d 368, 371 (Tex. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Lefkowitz & Steven Menashi, Brief of Amici Curiae Former Justice Department Officials in Support of Petitioners in Zubik v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:28 pm
” Similarly in Rosenberger v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
Rowley, Steven H. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the Court, drew support from the court’s opinion in 1962’s Glidden Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am
The Court also asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Nebraska v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Stevens (2010) and in Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:00 am
Justice Stevens recognized, as the Court had indicated in the 1955 case of United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
