Search for: "TECHNOLOGY PATENTS V DEUTSCHE"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
Use in a particular way By reference to the CJEU’s Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (#darferdas?) [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
Deutsche Telekom was an outlier anyway, given that it was the only member of the Fair Standards Alliance to participate. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SAS Inst. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
” See also Baystate Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 10:37 pm
Ford injunction in May over whether the efficacy of last year's "reform"--which included an amendment to Art. 139 Patent Act, Germany's patent injunction statute--can be judged by what happened in a SEP case in which the defendant's Huawei v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 12:59 am
Yesterday, the German Patent & Trademark Office (Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt; DPMA) issued a press release on its 2021 annual report, and the headline translates as follows:"China ever more innovative in digital technologies"The German PTO highlighted that China has, for the first time, overtaken the United States in the field of digital communications technology patent applications as its numbers increased by 6.8% from 4,032 to… [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:52 pm
I'd have to re-read the patent document to be 100% sure, but at this point I strongly suspect that this patent lacks a clear boundary and would, therefore, be indefinite by (strict) U.S. standards.The reason for which I believe the patent doesn't map to the 4G/5G specs is that "decreasing and increasing" are mathematically clear directions (numbers go down or up), which depending on the segment of a chart that you look at would give you roughly the… [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 8:38 pm
This Tuesday, the Mannheim Regional Court gave short shrift to Deutsche Telekom v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:23 am
For instance, in only one example of this trend, between 2011 and 2015, Russian clients of Deutsche Bank used “mirror trades” to launder $10 billion outside of Russia. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 1:53 am
With regard to the Actavis v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:44 am
OklahomaUnited States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 1:06 am
It would have been great if they could have made a joint submission with Deutsche Telekom (and possibly others). [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: The CAFC issued a precedential decision in Arctic Cat Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:16 am
In the first Nokia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 11:09 am
Conti cites to a February 2015 pretrial decision in Zenith Electronics, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:51 am
In the EU, Huawei v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
Hovenkamp & Norman V. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 1:11 pm
In the post-eBay v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
USPTO patent No 9006168). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 pm
’ The Unified Patent Court is unique in that it is very specialized. [read post]
