Search for: "THE STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL. v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, ET AL. (Majority)"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
” See, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Newport News School Bd, et al. , 2023 Va. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Because the NBAM includes public and proprietary data, coverage details are available only to state and federal “partners” and not the general public. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
The NTIA Broadband USA main page (scroll down) features a state-by-state summary of state broadband programs. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
The vast majority of toxic agents cause a single disease or a series of biologically-related diseases. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm
McDonnell et al., 1:18-cv-00361 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is Horne, et al., v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
State Office of Administrative Hearings, et al., No. 10-0002 (DB). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:53 am
Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC; Public Utility Commission of Texas, No. 08? [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
But it was the ruling’s impact on utility regulation, not the cost, that prompted the appeals court to reverse the decision. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Navistar had asked the United States Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. to void those polices because they had been adopted by the EPA without the public process required by law, but instead following input only from the SCR engine makers. [read post]
