Search for: "THOMAS A. v. SAMANTHA A." Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2024 there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Samantha Barbas, Actual Malice:  Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
ERISA Plan Fiduciaries and ESG Factors April 26, 2023 | Samantha J. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
EDT, the Law Library of Congress will host its Constitution Day event, a discussion by University at Buffalo School of Law Professor Samantha Barbas of her book Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (Yesterday, Samantha Barbas present on her book, Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Ryan (Associate Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Thomas J. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
Ken Thomas reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jurecic sat down with Thomas Rid and Brandon Van Grack to discuss the Justice Department indictment of Russian national Aleksandr Ionov: Scott Roehm argued that Biden administration officials need to reject the use of evidence obtained by torture in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts Judgement was handed down in Parkes v Hall and Ors [2021] EWHC 2824 (QB). [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am by Anna Salvatore
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]