Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
”While complaints were filed, because the companies allegedly failed to take appropriate responsive action, some workers were compelled to quit, while others experienced retaliation, such as termination of their employment.Believing that such conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
For example, in Watts v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
It is arguably a necessary power in order to meet the contingencies that arise over time.In the leading American case, Jackson v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:46 am
Superior Court in McGee v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 am
Sharp v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
We live in a world in which unpopular speech is quickly deemed offensive. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
" And murder -- even second-degree murder -- is a sufficiently serious charge that we definitely want to get the standard right, and not convict someone of murder who wouldn't be guilty of that very serious offense in a different appellate division or in front of a different panel in the Court of Appeal.So this is one of those cases where the California Supreme Court needs to take the case up and decide once and for all what the right rule should be. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In 1969, in Tinker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Let’s talk about Easha’s first case, Murray v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
On your deathbed, are you really excited that your principal contribution to California jurisprudence is making sure that jail inmates who are not convicted of any offense -- e.g., pretrial detainees -- are paid absolutely nothing for the eight hours of work they do every day in the kitchen for a private employer (thereby, coincidentally, taking that job away from someone else) whereas inmates who have been found guilty of a crime are entitled to receive pay… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am
California, 413 U.S. 15, 24 (1973). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am
In Robinson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:10 pm
In Cornell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 9:14 am
From Doe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
