Search for: "The People v. Hare" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2011, 5:15 pm
The Second Department in People v O'Hare, 73 AD3d 813 reviewed the basis for stopping and automobile and probable cause for arrest. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
For example, in February 2008, we noted that the Court in People v Smith (2008 NY Slip Op 00904 [4th Dept 2008)held that [W]e agree with defendant that the court erred in calculating the expiration date of the order of protection without taking into account the jail time credit to which she is entitled (see People v Clinkscales, 35 AD3d 1266, 1267; People v Hare, 27 AD3d 1171, 1172, lv denied 6 NY3d 892, 894, 898). [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 1:08 pm by Orin Kerr
He writes: The first theory appeared in a 1976 decision, Buckley v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:58 am
For example, from the point of view of an experienced reader, the distance between the English words ‘hair’ and ‘hare’ is the same as between the words ‘hair’ and ‘soup’, despite the fact that ‘hair’ and ‘hare’ are pronounced identically. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 11:47 am
 But it was the "Lorenzo Jones" comment that set the tone for the entire argument in Bilski, et al., v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 9:25 am by Randy Barnett
You can consider how the lower court in Williamson v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
One day we were discussing Int'l Societyy for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:17 pm
  Without proof of such allegations, I would think any prosecution for fraud in this country would violate the First Amendment under an old case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Supreme Court has held that the federal government can tax people for NOT buying something.From the syllabus: 3. [read post]