Search for: "Thomas v. The City of New York"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,088
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Brockner of counsel), for appellant.Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, New York City (Gregory J. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Brockner of counsel), for appellant.Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, New York City (Gregory J. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meehan of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice and Thomas S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meehan of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice and Thomas S. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
That reporting makes sense because both Kagan and Breyer consistently take a broad view of Congress' powers.People may not remember how important and in the news NFIB v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
”) At a Veterans Day rally last year, Trump said he would “root out” political opponents who “live like vermin within the confines of our country” warning that the greatest threats come “from within” (words that, according to ABC News and others, “echoed those of past fascist dictators like Hitler and Benito Mussolini,” and alarmed historians.) [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
New York City Off. of Mgt. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 4:07 pm
New York, a group of New York City landlords (“Petitioners”) filed suit in the District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the City and State of New York, the State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, New York City’s Rent Guidelines Board, and multiple state and New York City officials (“Respondents”),… [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:05 am
” IMAGE: The United Nations Headquarters, in New York city, on Oct. 18, 2023. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Indeed, as the plaintiffs themselves noted, the novel upon which 13 Reasons Why was based "was a hit, making the New York Times' young-adult best-seller list a few times. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
After all, as Oona Hathaway, Maggie Mills, and Thomas Poston note in their forthcoming Stanford Law Review article, “Ukraine’s most powerful asset in the war has been its capacity to demonstrate time and again that it is consistently on the right side of the law against an opponent bent on breaking every rule on the books. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am
New York and 335-7 LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
The cases challenge New York City’s rent-control laws as an uncompensated taking of private property in violation of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Thomas any better? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment Posted by Maximilian Muhn, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, on Thursday, February 1, 2024 Tags: Consumer Behavior, ESG, Financial disclosures, Firm disclosures, Purchase decisions Tornetta v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment Posted by Maximilian Muhn, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, on Thursday, February 1, 2024 Tags: Consumer Behavior, ESG, Financial disclosures, Firm disclosures, Purchase decisions Tornetta v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:50 am
Petitioners alleged that from 2003 to October 2016, Petitioners and Respondent operated as a partnership and shared equally the profits derived from arranging and organizing dance parties in New York City under the Freedom Party brand. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:12 am
City of New York, NY, 22-1170Issues: (1) Whether New York’s Rent-Stabilization Laws and accompanying regulations effect a per se physical taking by expropriating petitioners’ right to exclude; (2) whether the laws effect a confiscatory taking by depriving petitioners of a just and reasonable return; and (3) whether the laws effect a regulatory taking as an unconstitutional use restriction of petitioners’ property. [read post]
