Search for: "Thomas v. Given" Results 1 - 20 of 5,033
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In order to qualify for retirement benefits under Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15, an applicant for such benefits must demonstrate that he or she actually retired from public service employment in the first instance
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered:May 30, 2024 CV-23-1429 [*1]In the Matter of David Strzepek, Petitioner, v Thomas P. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
In order to qualify for retirement benefits under Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15, an applicant for such benefits must demonstrate that he or she actually retired from public service employment in the first instance
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered:May 30, 2024 CV-23-1429 [*1]In the Matter of David Strzepek, Petitioner, v Thomas P. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Justice Thomas Reverses President Trump's Executive Overreach in Cargill v. Garland
15 Jun 2024, 8:40 pm by Josh Blackman
However, in Cargill v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Right to Counsel Reaffirmed, Still in Crosshairs of Supreme Court
15 Jun 2024, 3:27 pm by John Floyd
And given the Roberts Court’s tendency to overturn precedent, Gideon v. [read post]
Criminal Jurisdiction - http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog
Why Did Justice Alito Join in Rejecting Standing in the Mifepristone Case?
14 Jun 2024, 5:26 am by Michael C. Dorf
In my essay after the oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
[Jonathan H. Adler] Justice Thomas Takes Aim at Associational Standing
13 Jun 2024, 2:21 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
[In his AHM v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered:June 6, 2024 CV-23-1696 [*1]In the Matter of Thomas Hart et al., Petitioners, v Town of Guilderland Industrial Development Agency et al., Respondents. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered:June 6, 2024 CV-23-1696 [*1]In the Matter of Thomas Hart et al., Petitioners, v Town of Guilderland Industrial Development Agency et al., Respondents. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Justice Barrett May Serve as a Bridge Between Ideological Sides in the Trump Presidential Immunity Case
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Josh Blackman] KBJ and Beyoncé
9 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Josh Blackman
When a real friend provides a gift, the understanding is that the gift is given due to some sort of genuine affection or prior relationship. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The presumption of parental involvement ten years on
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
A compelling explanation of the pro-contact culture is given by Olive Craig of Rights of Women: ‘The pro-contact culture … is a description of the assumptions professionals in the system make, whether consciously or not, that contact is going to happen anyway, so ‘let’s just get on with it’. [read post]
Pink Tape - http://pinktape.co.uk
President Donald Trump's Manhattan Convictions are Unconstitutional
7 Jun 2024, 10:51 am by Tom Smith
If Buckley v. [read post]
The Right Coast - https://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/
Rays of Hope for the Administrative State, by Peter L. Strauss
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
[Steven Calabresi] President Donald Trump's Manhattan Convictions are Unconstitutional
1 Jun 2024, 12:32 am by Steven Calabresi
If Buckley v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] Supreme Court OT2023 at the End of May
30 May 2024, 11:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The justices have been unanimous in the judgment in 20 of the 29 cases decided thus far, including today's unanimous decision by Justice Sotomayor in NRA v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Justice Thomas, Supreme Judicial Hypocrisy, and Race
29 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Thomas says the following about Brown v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Law and Media Round Up – 28 May 2024
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
The Court found that the then Home Secretary Suella Braverman passed the anti-protest measures in June 2023 despite having not been given the power by Parliament to do so [100]. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
The Infuriating Alito Two-Step
28 May 2024, 10:03 am by Michael C. Dorf
Wade, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
The Smith argument and the meaning of "testimonial"
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  At least that is true, I believe, given how Thomas applied the test in Williams v. [read post]
The Confrontation Blog - http://confrontationright.blogspot.com/
Could the Consumer Protection Finance Bureau (CFPB)’s Victory in the Supreme Court Last Week Boomerang to Disempower the Bureau and Invalidate its Regulations? Not if the Case is Read Carefully and Properly: A Response to Professor Hal Scott’s Wall Street Journal Op-Ed
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/