Search for: "Thryv, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm
There have been thousands of these proceedings instituted since their enactment into law, and the contours of how the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) have executed these statutory provisions have been the subject of several Supreme Court decisions (see "Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
The Federal Circuit rejected this argument based on dicta in Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
Make-Whole Monetary Relief As seen in the Thryv, Inc. and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1269 Cases 20-CA-250250 and 20-CA-251105 decided earlier this year, make-whole monetary relief includes all “direct and foreseeable pecuniary losses” by the employee. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 11:03 am
The Board’s decision in Thryv, Inc. is only one recent—but significant—example of this initiative operating in full swing. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:13 am
Application of Thryv, Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:29 am
Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Austin Campbell Summary: This article gives a brief overview of the NRLB’s new Thryv, Inc., decision, and its implications for the landscape of labor and employment law. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 11:23 am
In that case, Thryv, Inc., the NLRB ruled in a 3 to 2 decision that employers in violation of the NLRA can be assessed "consequential damages" in addition to the more traditional remedies of back pay and reinstatement. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 7:39 am
In a decision, Thryv, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 22, that was foreshadowed by recent invitations for briefs and prosecutorial conduct by NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo (see our prior posts here and here), the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) issued a significant ruling on December 13, 2022, that the standard make-whole remedy for employees harmed by an employer’s unfair labor practice (“ULP”) may include compensation for… [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 10:48 am
Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:52 pm
In its most recent decision, Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:19 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—holding that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board lacked jurisdiction to institute inter partes review of a telephonic patent owned Click-to-Call Technologies because Thryv, Inc. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:50 am
Thryv, Inc v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 7:33 pm
In Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 10:00 am
Ct. 2131 (2016) and Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 10:42 am
Ct. 2131 (2016) and Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:49 pm
United States Postal Service"; "Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:08 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
Nov. 17, 2020), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit extended the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
Nov. 17, 2020), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit extended the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 1:37 pm
In particular, the CAFC concluded that, according to the recent Supreme Court decision in Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
