Search for: "Turner v. Bounds" Results 1 - 20 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
 The Court has upheld laws like that in many instances, including Turner (requiring that cable systems carry broadcast television channels), Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:54 am by Nicholas Caputo
The Supreme Court will have to resolve this split and, in doing so, clarify the substance and bounds of editorial discretion as a doctrine. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 8:23 am
Turner Construction Co., 560 F.Supp. 871 (S.D.N.Y.1983), went the other way. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
It would also seem prudent (though hopefully redundant) for the advance notice bylaw to require that any material information disclosed to the corporation pursuant to the bylaw or director questionnaires also be disclosed to stockholders promptly as part of the proxy statement or pursuant to Rule 14a-12 as a pre-filing solicitation.[8] It appears that nominating stockholders sometimes do not consider themselves bound by Rule 14a-12 until well after the date when notice of a nomination is… [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
For Hobbes, public reason is reason bound by the judgment of the sovereign; for Kant, public reason is precisely that reason which is free from such constraint. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:53 am by Giles Peaker
O G Thomas Amaethyddiaeth CYF & Anor v Turner & Ors (2022) EWCA Civ 1446 In which the Court of Appeal considers whether a notice to quit that named the wrong tenant was valid. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Mark MacCarthy
It accepts that the different policy goal, articulated in the Supreme Court’s Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:30 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
This Essay argues that current definitions and applications of “legal advice” are overly and unnecessarily broad, confusing those bound by them, severely disadvantaging pro se litigants, undermining the purpose of such limitations, and, in more extreme cases, implicating due-process concerns expressed by the Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:52 am by SHG
Robins, which upheld a state law rule that required large shopping malls to allow leafleters and signature gatherers (a rule that has since been applied by some lower courts to outdoor spaces in private universities); Turner Broadcasting System v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm by Emily Coward
Murray, 476 U.S. 28 (1986) (plurality), and in cases where “racial issues [are] inextricably bound up with the conduct of the trial,” Ristaino v. [read post]