Search for: "Turner v. Laboratory Corp of"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case… [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Anderson, Rashawn Ray, Nicol Turner Lee and Jon Valent, and will be moderated by Elaine Kamarck. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm
Darlington Fabrics, Corp.). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 788 F. 2d 741, 744–745 (11th Cir. 1986). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am
Castro v. [read post]
Ma (Labs) Knows Best—California Court Uses Comcast To Reject Certification Of An Off-The-Clock Claim
14 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
The Court looked at last year’s Supreme Court decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
After reviewing the evidence . . . we hold the evidence of conscious indifference is not legally sufficient.General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
June 2, 2004); Turner v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Army Corps of Engineers for another look. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
Roche Laboratories, Inc., 243 F.Supp.2d 672, 677 (W.D. [read post]