Search for: "U.S. v. Ate"
Results 1 - 20
of 479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2013, 11:56 am
The U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
Our colleague Julian Ku over at Opinio Juris seems concerned that in refusing to dismiss apartheid-related ATS claims (from Ntsebeza v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:45 am
Eugene Kontorovich, guest-blogging) In discussions of Kiobel v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:51 pm
Arab Bank, PLC, 584 U.S. ___, 2018 WL 1914663 (U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:12 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
The following contribution to our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
First, the court reaffirmed a prior holding that ATS jurisdiction was appropriate even under the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 5:20 pm
The case involves the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), which permits non-U.S. citizens to bring a lawsuit in federal court in order to seek relief for certain violations of international law. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 8:59 am
Licci v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:15 pm
The U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
The Court further limited the ATS in Jesner v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
On April 17, 2013 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
On April 17, 2013 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 12:45 pm
Unlike in Ryan LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:35 am
Bolchos v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 6:20 am
In Abagninin v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 2:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Kiobel v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 9:00 pm
Doe to interrogate the importance of U.S. nationality in future Alien Tort Statute jurisdictional analysis, offering that the Supreme Court can still bring ATS jurisprudence back in line with history on the question of U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:46 pm
Related Cases: Doe I v. [read post]
