Search for: "U.S. v. Feinstein*" Results 1 - 20 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:03 am by Christopher J. Walker
Here is the November Edition of the most-downloaded recent papers (those announced in the last 60 days) from SSRN’s U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
The Recorder has Feinstein Leaves 'Profound' Impact on California's Federal Bench -- In her 30 years as a U.S. senator, Dianne Feinstein, who died Friday at age 90, pushed five presidents to create a more diverse federal bench in California, said lawyers who helped her vet judicial candidates. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:14 am by Dan Bressler
Frank Associates from representing a party in a legal malpractice suit originated in the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:51 am by Ben Allums and David L. Reisman
A Regulatory Increase to the Limits of Liability for Oil Pollution and an Amendment Exempting Small Passenger Vessels from the Limitation of Liability Act Present New Challenges for Vessel Owners U.S. maritime law experienced two significant changes on December 23, 2022—one pertaining to liability for oil pollution, the other concerning small passenger vessels. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
As you know, on March 28, 2022, the Supreme Court agreed to hear National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by John Bellinger
This approach was not adopted on the basis that Article V tribunals are required only in cases of “doubt” whether a person qualifies as a prisoner of war; because detainees could not qualify as prisoners of war, there was no reason to have Article V tribunals. [read post]