Search for: "UP-394 - State v. Roberts" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
" Finally, I read the Declaration of Robert Spitzer, which is Exhibit E of the California Attorney General's Supplemental Brief in Response to the Court's Order of September, 26, 2022, Duncan v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
This focus shows how the Dormant Commerce Clause has been applied to internet communications, introduces the importance of geographic filtering in this context, and thus sets up the analysis of the more recent social media platform issues addressed in Part V. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 5:48 pm by Simon Lester
United States, 276 U.S. 394, 409 (1928), and the President’s choice of remedies under section 232 is not subject to judicial review or to any of the other procedural checks that are the hallmarks of controlling Executive Branch decisionmaking in the administrative state. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Robert Yablon has this blog’s argument analysis. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that close to 30 states have weighed in on Husted v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
In some quarters, scientists are held up as shamans who are lionized and revered, at least when the scientists are advancing research and conclusions that are politically approved. [read post]