Search for: "US v. Andrew Grant"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
Independent former MP and candidate for North West Leicestershire, Andrew Bridgen, sued the former Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, for £100,000 in defamation over a tweet in which Hancock accused him of spreading “antisemitic, anti-vax, anti-scientific conspiracy theories. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am
I would guess most people hearing that would think a judge hearing the dissolution case wouldn’t hesitate to grant the petition and appoint a receiver to wind down and liquidate the business. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am
Supreme Court granted the motion. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Raich (2005), where the Court seemed to offer a collective-action rationale in holding that Congress can use its interstate-commerce power to prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana in compliance with state law permitting such use. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am
Although the Court of Appeal stated in Ocado v AutoStore that the interest of the general public usually arises after a decision is rendered, the position was different in this case as it might be too late for Nicoventures to use the information in the EPO proceedings if access was not granted immediately. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
It cited the Munich Local Division’s decision in SES v Hanshow that the wording of the application as filed could be used to interpret the granted claims, but noted that this was irrelevant in 10x Genomics v Curio and therefore required no decision. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
Conversely, in the second 10x Genomics v NanoString decision issued in Munich, the Court considered itself to have jurisdiction to decide a PI application for an EP despite infringement and revocation proceedings having been brought in German national courts under the German designation of the EP, which had resulted in an injunction being granted to 10x Genomics. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
Andrews, 534 U.S. 19, 27 (2001) (Ginsburg, J.); and Justices Scalia and Thomas have criticized the expansive use of the discovery rule as a “bad wine of recent vintage,” id. at 37 (Scalia, J., concurring); Rotkiske v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Thus, separation of powers is "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government" (Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781, 784 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Thus, separation of powers is "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government" (Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781, 784 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 am
In the County Court, Recorder Deal KC said that the language used in the correspondence dismissing Mr Ghaoui’s request “could be described as censorious. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
In granting a faculty, Briden Ch. concluded: “[12]. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
Claim 12 is therefore the only granted claim which falls to be considered at trial”. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
In its decision of 14 March 2024, in Prefamac and others v Autodesk and others, the Supreme Court of Belgium found that if a Court rules that a saisie should not have been authorised, the order granting such a saisie should be annulled and the effects of this annulment should also extend to the evidence obtained. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
Circuit decided the appeal, the Supreme Court on February 28, 2024 granted certiorari on Trump’s appeal of the D.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
” The Lower Court Decision In a short decision, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok granted GSP pre-answer dismissal of Ellen’s claims, ruling: (i) the alleged loans were “properly disclosed in the financial statements” of the Diner, (ii) Ellen failed to sufficiently allege “how [GSP] deviated from the accepted standard of care for accountants,” and (iii) Ellen failed to sufficiently allege “how they aided and… [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
” “Accordingly, the order of the Supreme Court, [*4]New York County (Andrew Borrok, J.), entered April 26, 2023, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant Getzel Schiff & Pesce, LLP’s motion to dismiss, should be reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 8:12 am
Professor Andrew Morriss suggests that we may have seen this dynamic in action in the Alabama legislature's response to LePage v. [read post]
