Search for: "US v. Eric Morrison" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, November 8, 2023 Tags: Clawbacks, Proxy season, SEC, SPACs Top 5 SEC Developments Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, November 8, 2023 Tags: Clawbacks, Proxy season, SEC, SPACs Top 5 SEC Developments Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Guest Author
  Let us recall, after Virginia seceded from the Union, Confederate soldiers were outside the city of Washington. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallImagine writing a 400+ page book titled "The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment: Its Letter and Spirit," but not discussing in any detail abortion, same-sex marriage, or affirmative action. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:57 am
Lund (University of Southern California), on Tuesday, January 11, 2022 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia A leading defamation judge in Sydney has joined legal experts in criticising the Morrison government’s proposed anti-troll law. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Freedom of Information The Panopticon Blog has a piece “FOIA and security bodies: running sections 23 and 24 together” concerning the recent judgment in the case of FCDO v IC, Williams and Others [2021] UKUT 248 (AAC) The non-profit group The Citizens, along with tech advocacy group Foxglove Legal, have been given permission to challenge the decision to refuse multiple information requests about the use of messaging apps Whatsapp and Signal by government ministers.… [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:37 pm by Steve Vladeck
Even if it’s a bit surprising that he said the quiet part out loud, it shouldn’t come as any great shock that Judge Brett Kavanaugh thinks the Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  He handed down judgment on 14 May 2018, dismissing the appeal ([2018] EWHC 1201 (QB)) On 16 May 2018 Langstaff J handed down judgment on costs in Various Claimants v Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC [2018] EWHC 1123 (QB). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
For example, Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner assert that the removal would be improper if it was done for improper motives: namely “personal, pecuniary, or purely partisan ends. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm by Scott Bomboy
“Governmental investigation and prosecution of crimes is a quintessentially executive function,” Scalia wrote in his dissent in a 1987 Supreme Court decision, Morrison v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  First, the claimants in group litigation claim of against Morrisons Supermarket successfully established that the defendant was vicariously liable for a data leak (Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB)). [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Bruce Morrison (D-CT) introduced a legislative response, that would become known as the Lautenberg Amendment. [read post]