Search for: "US v. Frederick" Results 1 - 20 of 846
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The Indian Supreme Court, too, has failed to use its power to mould the law despite regularly being confronted with disputes on this subject. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A brief review of two published monographs by Frederick L. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 7:51 pm
Husqvarna rejected a commonly used venue challenge, leaving plaintiffs with better odds of keeping their lawsuits where they want them. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In the trademark case of Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:32 am by Frank Cranmer
Rabiat Akande & Faisal Bhabha, Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper:  Insulating the Church: Ethiopian Orthodox Church of Canada v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Perhaps the Supreme Court will limit itself to deciding the relatively benign question of required procedures, parsing constitutional text and arguments in the standard manner.[23] Except that recent history suggests that the Court might instead use SEC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
, to self‐​made man Frederick Douglass, to serial inventor Joy Mangano’s miracle mop, Americans believe that with a good idea and enough hard work, anyone can enjoy economic success—no matter the circumstances of their birth. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]